Double Roll

About Double Roll

Since then, it has evolved into something broader: a different development pipeline, a different role for developers and quality assurance (QA), a different way of organising teams and, increasingly, a different relationship with customers.

Cubeia’s first phase was an open approach to AI. Developers could use it whenever they wanted. Phase two brought structure, with everyone using the same agents and working through the same AI-driven pipeline. That required Cubeia to solve questions around quality, reliability and how agents could work together, while getting employees comfortable with the new way of working. Grenstad believes that work has largely been completed.

“During the hybrid period in Q1, Cubeia solved 259 issues. Once it moved to the AI-driven process, that figure rose to 421 – a 62% increase. Larger projects increased from 17 to 58. So the answer is yes: moving to AI-driven development has increased our output tremendously,” Grenstad says.

What is Double Roll?

They connect four Instant Bonus tiers, Hold & Spin and two wheel-driven Bonus Spins modes, giving the game one consistent trigger throughout, while persistent multipliers make progression visible inside Bonus Spins and Super Bonus Spins. GO Ultra is the step up. Activating it removes standard Bonus Spins from the feature pool and introduces Super Duper Bonus Spins, with Coins concentrated on fewer reels and multipliers that grow in larger increments. The commercial hook sells itself on screen: Frank, the gnome gang over the fence, and a suburban garden turned battlefield. The game carries high volatility, with RTP configurations, exposure figures and other sensitive values retained in the internal fact sheet.

What is Double Roll?

An interview carried out by Black Cube with CEO of games developer Ezugi Kfir Kugler had allegedly confirmed that Evolution knowingly provided games in markets sanctioned by the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement.

Spectrum conducted follow-up interviews with these employees who had “provided derogatory information relating to Evolution’s business practices”.

It said all interviewees had cooperated fully and some of them had “virtually little or no familiarity with the allegations contained in the report, as their job responsibilities fall outside the scope of these matters”.